Blogs
Hey everyone - We just wanted to say thanks for your patence over the last few weeks. When a site as larg as this one goes done, recovery is not simple. That being said, we should be back to normal now. If you are seeing anything odd, please let us know.
Consumers really want to buy music.
I keep hearing everyone complain from the bottom and from the top that record sales are down; consumers aren’t buying.
This is true.
Why?
Why aren’t people buying music like they used to if they really want to buy music?
Music is such an important part of so many of our lives. Is it that we just don’t care these days?
Are we in danger of having a society where music just isn’t present in the fabric of our lives?
No, it’s not that we don’t like music anymore as a society.
Consumers aren’t buying music because we aren’t reaching them.
The methods and dynamics to connecting with consumers has changed, therefore the marketing needs to change to influence their buying decisions.
For the most part it hasn’t. We keep holding on to what used to work and by “we” I mean all of us; indie artists and major labels.
Either consumers aren’t aware of the product or they are aware of the product and don’t think it’s worth the price.
The previous statement was the very definition of ineffective marketing.
Yikes! They don’t think it’s worth it??
Access to the “mass market” is becoming more difficult and complex. The result is the mass market is nowhere near as “massive” as it used to be. This is because the mass market is continually fragmenting into smaller and smaller pieces.
As a big market disintegrates into smaller, more focused markets the definition changes from “mass market” to “niche market”.
As a marketer (of your music) you have to consider the fact that the mass market simply isn’t as easy to reach as it used to be because consumers have so many choices to hang out.
In any given media market, there used to be only 3 TV networks (CBS, NBC, and ABC), 1 or possibly 2 (genre specific) radio stations, 1 or 2 newspapers, and maybe MTV for consumers to receive input about any product, project, or artist.
Think about how easy that was for the record labels to reach us when we were such a captive audience.
Now we have well over 500 channels on TV in addition to the initial 3 networks.
There are endless possibilities for consumers to devour radio including their 1 or 2 local terrestrial radio stations, HD Radio, Satellite Radio, I Heart Radio (1,000 stations), Pandora, Spotify, Deezer, Slacker, personal playlists, etc.
Every magazine, YouTube, social media, and countless music sites are accessible online at anytime, anywhere in the world from a smartphone.
There is a fundamental, paradigm shift happening right now in the music industry.
Simply put, the methods that were once effective in exposing consumers to new music and influencing their buying decisions has gone through a drastic change.
These formerly effective methods were geared towards communicating to and converting a mass market.
The WHOLE industry will have to change with it and adapt. Until then, it will continue to suffer.
Consider this, as indie artists and human beings for that matter, our understanding of our everyday reality is directly related to the input we receive.
Think about that concept outside the realm of marketing music for a second.
- Poor children aren’t aware that they are poor until they are exposed to how the other half lives.
- Children of famous parents aren’t aware that their parents are famous until they are exposed to other children whose parents aren’t famous.
- Mentally and physically abused people are sometimes not aware (or forget over time) that there are more peaceful ways to live because they get only one kind of input.
- People that are constantly told they are bad, horrible, not important, etc., will ultimately begin to believe that if it is the only stimulus they are exposed to.
We are all products of the input we receive in life and, of course, input from the market place is equally applicable.
The input we receive becomes our reality.
My point is when you think about marketing your music you naturally think about how music (in the form of your favorite artists) has been marketed to you in the past.
It’s the only input you have ever received with regards to music marketing, and it worked.
Not for you.
Not for the major labels either.
Shania Twain’s “ Up! ” was certified 11 million units sold in September 23 rd , 2004.
10 years later, Jason Aldean’s “ Old Boots, New Dirt ” was the best-selling country record of 2014 and it barely cracked 1 million in sales by December of last year.
Clearly the record labels haven’t got it figured out yet, man.
So why follow them?
Consumers haven’t stopped wanting or liking music. The way in which they receive their input about music has drastically changed due to technology and a fragmented marketplace.
So, in a way, they’re starving for good music, they just can’t find it in the new marketplace. They can’t find it because we aren’t getting it to them in a language/manner they find acceptable.
The artists and labels that have figured this out are thriving.
Listen, consumers are just as desperate to be turned on to really good music as you are to sell it to them. Crazy, huh?
The new way for receiving this marketing stimulus via social media and content marketing through email and text exchanges is consumed COMPLETELY differently than the mass media branding methods that were effective before.
Systems and strategies for addressing mass media don’t work for private, one on one interactions which is how social media, text messaging, and emails are consumed.
Once the fundamental changes to language and the approach have been internalized, understood, and executed masterfully music sales will rise.
Huh?
Taylor Swift provides us with proof of concept on this statement.
While Jason Aldean is an undeniable superstar at the top of his game with TONS of country radio support for his new record, he barely broke 1 million copies.
Taylor Swift released “ 1989 ” in 2014 and it was certified 4 million in sales January 22 of this year and she did it WITHOUT any help from country radio .
She knows how to communicate with her audience effectively in the new marketplace and she has the sales to prove it.
Not only is Taylor’s audience aware that her new record was released, they all felt it was worth it.
Right now I want you to quit lamenting the fact that you aren’t as popular as Taylor Swift and concentrate on the concept here. COUNTRY RADIO ABANDONED this artist and still, she QUADRUPLED the sales of the #1 selling record that country radio unwaveringly supported!
How did that happen?!?!?! Your future as an artist lies in the answer to this question, people.
You hear Jason Aldean’s singles every day, multiple times a day on the radio, every single he’s released is in heavy rotation.
You never hear Taylor Swift anymore on country radio (except for very recently but only on the limited number of NASH ICON stations which is a joint venture between Cumulus radio stations and Scott Borchetta’s NASH ICON label who is Taylor’s record label head…so that was just a matter of time).
In plain English, record sales are down because labels are not marketing properly. Period.
Your marketing sucks too.
That is if you even think about marketing.
People want music, people need music, and people continue to consume music.
Just not your music.
It’s about the marketing.
Artists need innovative marketing strategies.
Want some staggering proof that it’s all about marketing?
I’ll give you 2 examples.
This is the absolute dumbest most insanely unnecessary product ever produced.
I believe the infomercials for this product still run today.
That is because of only one reason, it sells .
It sells for only one reason, marketing.
Nobody NEEDS the Pasta Pro but the buyers all feel it is worth it because it’s marketed correctly.
Here is another example that is simply mind blowing.
Bottled water.
Everyday people purchase a 1 liter bottle of water for $1.99.
On average. There are 3.7 liters in a gallon.
That equates roughly to $7.40/gallon for a product we can get for free.
We happily pay more for water, something we can obtain at no cost, than we do for gasoline.
This is because of marketing.
We feel like it’s worth it.
Bottom line to all artists and major labels, if you aren’t selling your music, it’s because people aren’t aware of it and the ones that are don’t feel it’s worth it.
What has to happen for consumers to think your music is worth it?
If we can sell free water for more than twice the price of a gallon of gas, we damn sure can sell music.
MusicClout.com
The site is slowly coming back to life so do not panic. All of the media files, blogs etc. are being copied over and we should be back to normal sometime today. As you can probably guess, we had a catastrophic failure on our old server. No idea what happened and they were not being very helpful. We changed companies and are just restoring the site from backups.
Sorry for the inconvenience!!
Just wanted to welcome all the new members to Mixposure. There have been a lot of signups lately so we would like to take a moment to welcome you to Mixposure.
Please let us know if you have any questions!!
Hi, all.
Those who have been tuning in to Aardvark Express and Doug Dickens Showcase of Independant Artists on Mixstream Radio will know that I have a new Brainplant album out by the name of Steampunk. I held contests on both shows to win codes for free downloads of the album. Well done to the winners, who were True Vulgarians, Maureen Quinn, Lyrical Princess, Yvonne Jay, Carmella and Toni.
For those who missed it, you can buy the full album at my Bandcamp page (just click the link) for just £7 ($10).
Enjoy.
Hi, all
Anyone who is planning to listen to Aardvark Express on Mixsteam Radio (8pm EST), I have something special planned for the chatroom. Join me tonight to find out what it is.
Brainplant
Well we made it through the holiday's and now it seems like the right time to do the next "site" tune. Anyone have a preference? Same Song Title Madness? Same Lyric Challenge? Something else?
As of 24th January 2016, I am releasing my music under the creative commons license. This means you can use in your videos on youtube. All I ask is a return link in the description. So here is the list of tracks I am releasing under Creative Commons License to my fellow creators... Not all tracks are being uploaded as some I do have other copyrights on them and others are colabs with other artists which means I can not release them under Creative Commons Attribution License as I do not owe 100% rights to them even though I wrote the original track. You don't have to use these tracks just for video productions etc, you can download purely for listening pleasure and can copy to as many devices as you wish. Be forwarned I have unquie style of music and sound that sometimes can be a bit out there (while other tracks are more classical ie; rock and dance) some you may like yet others you may not as I try to cover a very broad spectrum of genres, styles and mixes.
All I ask is a link to this page in you video description. Something along the lines of;
“ (song title) ” by Nighthawk Music is released under a Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Artist: Nighthawk
http://www.wackywoodworks.co.nz/music/songs.php
I've loved music my entire life. Eventually I started writing and playing-- both on my own and with others. After a while, I came up with a few recordings of which I'm proud. I hope you enjoy them as well. When I recorded (most of) these songs, I assumed they would be heard by less then 25 people: my circle of select friends, family, and fellow musicians. I never imagined they'd be available to strangers via the internet. I'm gratified by the response my music has received-- especially when one considers the high caliber of musical talent that exists on this and other original music sites.
My music can approximately be described as post-industrial surburban ragtime, with surf sidetones. I grew up on Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers, The Cars, Dire Straits, and Elton John. Regrettably, my music doesn’t readily reflect that. But I think the greatest influence has been the people I’ve worked with over the years. I’ve learned a lot by watching others develop their ideas. I can’t say I sound like anyone I’ve ever worked with-- but their influence is certainly present.